ICE Then vs. ICE Now: What Actually Changed?

|QLP News Room

Every administration since at least 2009 has claimed to be tough on immigration enforcement, and every administration's critics have disputed that framing from one direction or another. This piece starts Cluster 2 of our series with the actual numbers: formal removals, interior enforcement, and detention, tracked consistently across Obama, the first Trump term, Biden, and the current Trump term. The goal isn't to crown a "toughest" administration — it's to give you a real baseline before the next four pieces dig into specific policy shifts, starting with why Obama's own enforcement strategy changed over time.

A Note on What "Removal" Means Here

Documented fact: DHS's own historical data (Table 39 of the DHS Yearbook of Immigration Statistics) tracks two different things: removals (a compulsory departure based on a formal removal order, which carries reentry bars) and returns (an informal departure with no removal order, historically common at the border). Older totals you may see cited — like "5.3 million" for Obama's two terms, or "973,937" for his first year — combine both categories. Returns were very common in the 2000s and dropped sharply after 2012 as enforcement shifted toward formal processing. To compare administrations fairly, this piece uses removals only, the more consistent and more legally significant category, throughout.

Official White House portrait of President Barack Obama seated at the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office

President Barack Obama
Obama's two terms (FY2009–2016) produced the highest formal-removal totals of any administration in this dataset. Photo: Pete Souza, Official White House Photo, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Removals by Fiscal Year, 2009–2025

Documented fact: Per DHS's own Yearbook of Immigration Statistics and ICE's published annual reports:

Formal ICE removals by fiscal year '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 Obama Trump I Biden Trump II Source: DHS Yearbook of Immigration Statistics Table 39 (FY2008–2022, "removals" column only, excludes returns); ICE FY2024/FY2025 published removal totals. FY2013 peak: 432,334. FY2021 low: 85,783 (Biden transition, Title 42 border policy in effect).

The actual annual removal totals behind that chart: FY2009: 379,739. FY2012: 415,579. FY2013 (the real peak): 432,334. FY2016 (end of Obama): 332,331. FY2017 (Trump I begins): 284,365. FY2019: 347,090. FY2020 (COVID): 237,364. FY2021 (Biden begins, Title 42 border policy suppressing formal removals): 85,783. FY2023: 142,580 (ICE ERO removals; Title 42 expulsions, a separate category, added another 62,545 that year). FY2024: 248,739. FY2025 (Trump II): 319,980.

Official White House portrait of President Donald Trump

President Donald Trump
Formal removal totals fell during Trump's first term compared to Obama's peak years, even as interior-enforcement rhetoric intensified. Photo: Shealah Craighead, Official White House Photo, October 6, 2017, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Interior Enforcement Is a Different Story Than Total Removals

Documented fact: Total removal counts include people caught at the border, which is a different thing from interior enforcement — ICE agents arresting people already living in U.S. communities. The Migration Policy Institute's analysis of ICE's own interior-enforcement data found a much starker pattern here: interior removals averaged about 155,000 per year during FY2009–2016 (Obama), fell to about 81,000 per year during FY2017–2020 (Trump I), and fell further to about 38,000 per year during FY2021–2024 (Biden). By this specific measure — people removed from inside the country, not at the border — the Obama administration's interior enforcement significantly exceeded both the first Trump term and the Biden term, which runs against the "soft on interior enforcement" framing Obama-era critics used and the "toughest ever" framing sometimes applied to the first Trump term. We unpack exactly how that targeting was structured, tier by tier, in our breakdown of how ICE's target population expanded from a formal priority system to no categories at all.

Average annual interior removals, by administration Obama (FY09–16)~155,000/yr Trump I (FY17–20)~81,000/yr Biden (FY21–24)~38,000/yr Source: Migration Policy Institute, "ICE Arrests and Deportations from the U.S. Interior," Feb. 4, 2025, citing ICE's own published enforcement statistics. Current Trump-term interior data not yet available as a comparable multi-year average.
Ice Would Cage Jesus Too anti-ICE sticker

"Ice Would Cage Jesus Too" Sticker

Whichever administration's numbers you're looking at, the underlying machinery — detention, removal orders, interior arrests — has run continuously for over a decade. This pro immigrant design is a blunt way of saying the moral math doesn't change just because the party in office does.

➡ View the Sticker

➡ Browse the Anti-ICE Stickers Collection

Detention Population: A Different Kind of Record

Documented fact: The current administration's detention population set a documented record independent of removal totals: ICE detention peaked at 70,766 people on January 24, 2026, described by researchers tracking the data as the highest number ever recorded. That is a measure of how many people are being held at once, not how many are ultimately removed — another example of the "which number, measuring what" caution from earlier in this series.

Official White House portrait of President Joe Biden

President Joe Biden
Biden's term began with the lowest formal-removal count in this dataset, partly a Title 42 data-classification effect discussed below. Photo: Official White House Photo, 2021, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Watch the Denominator Here Too

Interpretation: In mid-2025, DHS publicly claimed roughly 622,000 (later 605,000) "deportations" since the current term began. Immigration researcher Austin Kocher's independent analysis found ICE's own reported removals for that same period totaled 335,222 — and that even adding a generous estimate of Customs and Border Protection's removals on top of that could only plausibly reach 408,807 to 485,829, leaving a gap of well over 100,000 between the claimed figure and what published data supports. DHS did not publish a methodology explaining the larger number. We flag this not to single out one administration — the "returns vs. removals" conflation described above shows earlier administrations' totals need the same scrutiny, and our piece on the denominator problem in immigration statistics walks through exactly this kind of unsupported round number in more detail — but because it's a live, current example of exactly the kind of claim this series keeps warning readers to check before repeating. If you've heard the "Obama did the same thing" line used to wave away scrutiny of a specific number, our fact-check of that claim is a useful companion piece.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which administration deported the most people?

By formal removals alone, FY2013 under Obama (432,334) is the highest single year in this dataset. By interior removals specifically — arguably the more meaningful measure of domestic enforcement intensity — Obama's administration also leads on a per-year average. The current administration's FY2025 total (319,980) is the highest since FY2013, and its detention population is the highest ever recorded, though its comparable interior-removal average isn't established yet.

Why did removals drop so sharply in 2021?

Partly the Biden administration's initial policy shift, and partly a data-classification effect: Title 42, a pandemic-era border authority that expelled people without formal removal orders, was categorizing large numbers of border encounters outside the "removals" column entirely during this period, which suppressed the formal removal count without necessarily meaning fewer people were turned away at the border.

Does a higher removal number always mean more interior arrests?

No. Total removals include border cases, which can rise or fall independently of how aggressively ICE is arresting people already living in the country. The interior-specific numbers above are a better measure of that specific question.

All My Homies Hate ICE anti-ICE sticker

"All My Homies Hate ICE" Sticker

Four administrations, one continuous enforcement apparatus — if the numbers in this piece left you more skeptical of "toughest ever" claims from any direction, our Anti-Ice Stickers say it more plainly on a laptop or water bottle.

➡ View the Sticker

➡ Browse the Anti-ICE Stickers Collection

Every Abolish Ice sticker and magnet purchase from our Anti-ICE Stickers collection helps fund the reporting and continued development of this public resource.

Related Reading

Obama Deported Hundreds of Thousands. So Why Was His Enforcement Strategy Different?: goes deeper on the numbers introduced here and the real criticism Obama's record drew from his own allies.

From Priorities to Mass Enforcement: How ICE's Target Population Expanded: traces the memo-by-memo history behind the interior-enforcement numbers charted in this piece.

The Denominator Problem in Immigration Statistics: the methodology background for evaluating unsupported round numbers like the 622,000-deportations claim flagged above.


Sources: DHS Office of Homeland Security Statistics, Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, Table 39 (Noncitizen Removals, Returns, and Expulsions); Migration Policy Institute, "ICE Arrests and Deportations from the U.S. Interior," Feb. 4, 2025; ICE FY2023 and FY2025 published enforcement statistics; Austin Kocher, "DHS Claims 622,000 Deportations, Here's Why That Number Might Be Meaningless," Substack.


About Quietly Loud Prints

Quietly Loud Prints designs original parody, activist, educational, and political stickers inspired by history, humor, and grassroots movements. Our goal is to create thoughtful designs that help people express ideas through everyday objects.